motherlode
@Rolln_J
Supporter
- 5,524
- 313
My car has a chevy 350 (Bare in mind I'm a UK citizen) so I'm a hypocrite but a hypocrite with a cool car!
w/sqft is utter bullshit yes!! I totally agree.
lol I like this guy!
My car has a chevy 350 (Bare in mind I'm a UK citizen) so I'm a hypocrite but a hypocrite with a cool car!
w/sqft is utter bullshit yes!! I totally agree.
GARDEN EFFICIENCY RATING - Online Calculator
How much juice you burn to grow a gram..
Standard methods of reporting garden yields are imprecise and don't take the factor of time into account. This is a summary after discussion on a new standard formula for reporting yields and efficiency.
The GE Rating is based on the amount of kilowatt hours used to produce one gram. This factors in how long your strains flower and the resulting number makes it simple to compare 4000 watt gardens with 400 watt gardens. The calculations are easy, here is an example:
2000 watt flowering area
60 days of flowering
12 hours on light cycle
total yield: 49.5 ounces
1) Divide the total wattage of your lamps by 1000 to determine the kilowatts per hour:
2000 / 1000 = 2 kw/h
2) Multiply the previous result by the hours of the light cycle (usually 12):
2 x 12 = 24
3) Multiply the previous result by total days in flowering to determine how many kilowatt hours you used:
24 x 60 = 1440
4) Make sure your yield is in grams, so:
28.4 x 49.5 ounces = 1405.8 grams
5) Now simply divide grams by kilowatts:
1405.8 / 1440 =
0.97 grams per kilowatt hour, or a GE Rating of 0.97! Good job to the hypothetical grower, approaching a GE of 1 is the first plateau to be reached and is a sign of an experienced grower.
The secondary additions to the GE formula would be for the "Whole Garden GE Rating" which must include time spent in cloning and in veg. Figure it out the same way, with days spent under cloning lights, hours per day, and add those totals to the watt usage before dividing. This will give you a much lower rating than the standard Bloom GE Rating, but is more accurate for SCROG gardens, and anyone who is involved with extra vegetation time.
lol I like this guy!
i guess if you have to have a figure to brag about then you can calculate it however you want . people with legal plant counts usually could give a flying fuck how much juice they use
Does having a legal plant count mean that you have infinite money?
Or is it because the "legal" growers are selling it to pay for their grows.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
WTF is up with that shit? Seriously. I figure you're painting anyone who either agrees with him or is interested in how he proposes some numbers be worked with the same brush.no it means i dont have to worry if my intake fan cost $13bucks a month to run so long as I have the number of plants im allowed, but yes, compared to you, I do have infinite money.
Do you hear that?I think your phones ringing, some bollocks wants a 5 pence worth of skunk, typical self loathing closet pusher
WTF is up with that shit? Seriously. I figure you're painting anyone who either agrees with him or is interested in how he proposes some numbers be worked with the same brush.
Waste is a sin if you can't understand that then please go back to your medi user stoned world and don't give a fuck about anyone else but yourself.
By the way weed sells for £10 for 0.8g's I could be very fucking rich if I really wanted to be, I choose not to sell my weed as I want to still grow in tomorrow and next year and the year after.
Retards sell their weed and retards get caught.
Another issue with that metric would be that growers in hot areas would unfairly be biased against, as growers in Canada would obviously be running their ACs a lot less than growers in Florida, making the Canadians "more efficient", even though the better growers may be in Florida.
As an analyst who's dealt with countless ratios like P/E, EPS, ROI, Sharpe, Sortino, etc., the one thing I've learned is that numbers certainly don't tell the whole picture.
To try to come up with one metric that is THEE metric to measure efficiency is ridiculous.